![vtc autodesk revit architecture vtc autodesk revit architecture](https://damassets.autodesk.net/content/dam/autodesk/www/training-and-certification/images/detail-page/45-60-questions-icon-225x225.jpg)
This new interface increases the number of mouse clicks per task which slows down the process. I see myself switching between tabs multiple times to create something that is simple. I can describe this UI changes as disaster. Then it's been changed again in version 2011.
![vtc autodesk revit architecture vtc autodesk revit architecture](https://res.cloudinary.com/dnngwl1yi/images/f_auto,q_auto/v1572908371/autocad_one_key_shortcuts_feature_vtcbzz/autocad_one_key_shortcuts_feature_vtcbzz.jpg)
Revit: new interface changes introduced in Revit version 2010. There are no (can't-be-ignored) error messages, no hidden commands. Keyboard shortcuts can easily be made for every task and view in Archicad. I don't have to memorize what this particular text box does, I only have to see the graphics near it to know its task. UI is organized into customizable toolbars and pallets with descriptive graphics. I only had to watch interactive training guide to learn the program's interface. Vector patterns are present through all the versions of revitįirst off all thanks for the quick replies.Īrchicad: simple, descriptive, user friendly. There is also several display modes like hidden line, shaded with edges, shaded without edges In the previous versions, the display of real textures preview in 3d window didn't exist up until version 2011 of revit, which had a big entrance via enabling not only the display of textures, but also the display of ambient occultation. To make it worse the 3d navigation is via 2d zoom, meaning that you navigate in your model like you are zooming in a picture. You can add perspective view via cameras which suks. Engineers or some industrial designers, its use in my opinion in architecture should be limited to descriptive views (sectional 3ds…etc). I HATE axonometric VERY MUCH and I think that parallel projections are best suited for mech. Revit: Its default 3d projection is an axonometric view!!!!. Vector patterns are enabled via the use of enternal 3d window engine. Shadows are enabled in openGL in version 14 which is great although I didn’t try it yet. The 3d modes are shading, wire frame, hidden line (internal engine only) The 3d window uses openGL engine to enable the user to see raster materials applied to objects this helps a lot with the modeling and decision making. There is the feature of 3d explore which I like to play with when I have clients in it impresses them and makes them understand the design better. Archicad makes you feel like you are holding a camera and going through the model. Revit: wonderful!!!! I only have to say that I can play with these revit's massing tools in forever!Īrchicad: 3d window use 'exploration' rather than 'zooming'. Is NOT capable of creaing organic shapes whatsoever unless with a help of a 3rd party add on like cigraph's archiform. However, there is organic architecture which is a zone that I cannot cross using archicad's modeling tools. You can very quickly create a building model with high level of detail and finishing. Whereas revit is a non user friendly building modeler (as to be discussed bellow) and a user friendly object creator/editor! Very strange fact.EhĪrchicad: archicad's strong point is its flexibility. I can say that archicad is a user friendly building modeler and non user friendly objects editor/creator. You just create a model, add dimensions, link/constrain them to specific parameters and make your object work like magic actually, this is the most attractive feature in revit along side with it's 3d massing tools that is yet to be discussed. Revit: I'm surprised to find that objects (families) creation in revit is something that is as easy as drafting. creating something like the "Partition Panel "that has a number of panels and accessories on/off switches…).
![vtc autodesk revit architecture vtc autodesk revit architecture](https://mir-s3-cdn-cf.behance.net/project_modules/max_1200/d18ca831658511.565b84a92cbfa.jpg)
There has to be programming and scripting done (e.g. Of course there are objects that you can create fairly easy like simple doors or so, but if you want to add parameters or functionality to you objects. Though it's very complex and knowledge-based and process to create an object or a lib. Revit: you go into a 2d editing mode where you use 2d drafting tools (offset, trim, line, circle….etc) to draw the spline or the shape you want.Īrchicad: I have to admit first that I had no training in this topic.
![vtc autodesk revit architecture vtc autodesk revit architecture](https://damassets.autodesk.net/content/dam/autodesk/www/training-and-certification/images/learning-pathways/revit-for-architectural-design/advanced-3d-modeling-for-architectural-design-thumb-581x290.jpg)
Slabs, fills, lines….etc):Īrchicad: very easy! You just click on an edge or node and a spline editing toolbar appears, in archicad this is done very quickly. Hey there, In my office I use archicad for everything.Ħ months earlier I decided to try revit so i had revit 2011 and did some interesting stuff with it, and came upon these points about revit vs archicad